Sovereign Citizens
Sovereign Citizens using misinterpretation of jurisdiction
Why the Sovereign Citizen approach Fails
Examples of why Sovereign Citizen jurisdiction claims fail with case Law
Why Sovereign Citizens are not sovereign
Sovereign Citizens are still subject to government jurisdiction
Legal systems reject Sovereign Citizen claims
The "Straw Man" concept is fiction
The "Straw Man" theory is legally invalid
Personal sovereignty does not exempt from taxes or laws
Legal doctrine of sovereignty does not apply to individuals
Claims of "Opting Out" of the system are unsupported
Sovereign Citizen arguments lead to legal consequences
Courts hold Sovereign Citizens accountable
Government services and benefits come with legal obligations
Jurisdictional claims do not absolve legal responsibility
Sovereign Citizens are not sovereign
Sovereign Citizen popular bullshit myths
Why bullshit Sovereign Citizen myths fail
Birth certificates do not create a trust or fund
Filing IRS forms for fraudulent purposes is illegal
The Secretary of the Treasury does not manage individual trusts
Filing these forms can lead to prosecution
No legal precedent supports Sovereign Citizen theories
Let's shed a bright light on jurisdiction by painting a what if scenario
Here's why the Sovereign Citizen theory is complete bullshit
Physical presence establishes jurisdiction
Actions can extend jurisdiction
Personal belief doesn't override legal authority
Jurisdiction can be challenged
The popular Hague Convention Sovereign Citizen blanket
Misunderstanding of international treaties
Confusion with "The Hague" as a legal authority
Misrepresentation of sovereignty
Confusion with the Hague Convention on private international law
Why the Hague Convention does not apply to Sovereign Citizens
The Hague Convention only governs international legal matters
Sovereign Citizenship is not recognized by international law
Courts consistently reject Sovereign Citizen claims
Why real diplomats get a jurisdiction pass and not Sovereign Citizens
Why diplomatic immunity does not apply to Sovereign Citizens
Diplomatic immunity requires formal recognition
Sovereign citizenship is not backed by any treaty or law
Legal precedent dismisses Sovereign Citizen claims
